Role-Based Navigation Guide
Every role has a different relationship with AI-assisted engineering. With 92% of US developers now using AI tools daily and AI co-authored code showing 1.7x more issues and a 2.74x higher vulnerability rate, the stakes for getting adoption right are enormous -- but the approach varies dramatically depending on your seat at the table. This section provides curated reading paths so that each role can quickly find the standards, practices, and recommendations most relevant to their responsibilities.
How to Use This Section
The AEEF Standards framework is organized around five pillars that apply universally. However, how you engage with those pillars depends on your role. A developer needs hands-on prompt engineering techniques; a CTO needs architecture governance patterns; an executive needs board-ready metrics. This section translates the universal framework into role-specific guidance.
Step 1: Identify your primary role from the table below. Step 2: Follow the link to your role's overview page. Step 3: Work through the sub-pages in order -- they are sequenced from foundational to advanced. Step 4: Use the cross-references to dive deeper into specific standards or pillars when you need more detail.
Many professionals wear multiple hats. If you are a tech lead who also manages people, read both the Developer Guide and the Development Manager Guide. If you are a CTO at a startup who also writes code, add the Developer Guide to your reading list.
Role-to-Guide Mapping
Cross-Role Dependencies
Effective AI-assisted engineering requires collaboration across roles. The following matrix shows where guides intersect and where cross-role conversations are most critical.
| Topic | Roles Involved | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Quality gates for AI code | Developer, QA Lead, Dev Manager | Everyone must agree on what "good enough" means for AI-generated code |
| Sprint velocity recalibration | Scrum Master, Product Manager, Developer | AI changes delivery speed unevenly; all parties need shared expectations |
| Tool selection and provisioning | CTO, Dev Manager, Developer | Tool choices cascade through the entire engineering organization |
| Risk governance | Executive, CTO, Dev Manager | Board-level risk reporting depends on ground-level risk identification |
| Investment justification | Executive, CTO, Product Manager | ROI models require input from both technical and product perspectives |
| Security posture | Developer, QA Lead, CTO | The 2.74x vulnerability rate in AI code requires vigilance at every level |
Reading Paths by Maturity Level
If your organization is just beginning its AI-assisted engineering journey, the reading order matters. Use the Maturity Model to assess your current level, then follow the appropriate path.
Level 1 -- Exploring (Weeks 1-4)
- Start with the Executive Guide: Strategic Imperative for organizational context
- Read the Developer Guide: Daily Workflows for hands-on orientation
- Review the CTO Guide: Technology Strategy for tool selection
- Consult the QA Lead Guide: Testing Strategy for quality baselines
Level 2 -- Adopting (Months 2-3)
- Work through the full Developer Guide end-to-end
- Implement the Scrum Master Guide: Sprint Adaptation processes
- Establish the Development Manager Guide: Metrics That Matter dashboards
- Begin Product Manager Guide: Roadmap Planning adjustments
Level 3 -- Scaling (Months 4-6)
- Deploy the full Development Manager Guide framework
- Calibrate using Scrum Master Guide: Estimation in an AI World
- Optimize with CTO Guide: Architecture Considerations
- Report progress using Executive Guide: Board-Ready Metrics
Level 4-5 -- Optimizing and Leading
- All role guides should be fully implemented
- Focus shifts to continuous improvement and industry leadership
- Use the Maturity Model for ongoing self-assessment
Keeping Current
The AI-assisted engineering landscape evolves rapidly. Each role guide includes a "What to Watch" section highlighting emerging trends. We recommend:
- Monthly: Review your role guide for updated practices
- Quarterly: Re-assess your maturity level using the Maturity Model
- Annually: Conduct a full cross-role alignment review using the dependency matrix above
These role guides are designed to complement, not replace, the core AEEF Standards and Five Pillars. Always refer to the authoritative standards documents when establishing formal policies or governance structures.